Last Friday, a determined crew of eight SoMoFoNauts descended into Prometheus. Not everyone came back. At least not from the medical scene. But before I get to that, I should state at the outset that this is not a review of the film. If it were, I would give it a 7 out of 10. After all the build up on this blog, you might think this is a low score. Relative to expectations, it really is a low score. There was certainly a lot to like, such as the overall look of the film, the lush moodiness, it really is a Ridley Scott science fiction film. That previously mentioned medical scene did indeed meet the bar established by Alien for one total freakout moment. But it failed the Alien bar too. First off, there is no breakout stunning alien design, that matches the genius of H.R. Giger. Instead we get some large pale worms, and a pale amorphous tentacled beast. Which are very boring and generic. But more damning was the overload of cliché twists and unanswered questions, for which I blame the film’s co-writer and Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof.
But as I said, this isn’t a review. Instead, it’s an exploration of the expectation space I had for this film. My first fear was that the film would be a rehash of Alien. In some ways it kind of was, in that there’s a creepy android that wants to preserve a gestating alien in stasis, a salt of the earth comic relief aspect to the crew, a cold corporate representative, and so on. But luckily, the plot was not a pure horror house arc. It was trying to explain a mystery. Unfortunately, it was deeply wrapped in exogenesis, the theory that life on Earth originated elsewhere. Which is something I don’t believe in. But as it turns out, the appearance of exogenesis meant that her narcissistic cousin anthropocentrism was just around the corner. And I find that really annoying and cheap.
What the hell am I talking about? Anthropocentrism is the theory that humans are the center of the universe, and it interprets reality exclusively from the perspective of human values and experiences. And Prometheus makes it all about us. But Alien was just that, alien. The crew of the Nostromo finds this gorgeous derelict spacecraft, carrying an lethal cargo of infesting creatures. Giger’s surreal design of the ship, it’s pilot, the infamous Space Jockey, and all the stages of the alien life cycle all contributed to one of the most compelling demonstrations of otherness I’ve ever seen in any film. I loved that. This ship had nothing to do with us. What was its mission? How old was it? Who was this race? Was it attacked by these creatures? Was it transporting them? Lots of great questions, but it was far beyond our petty experience, it was a glimpse of the universe getting along quite nicely without us.
SPOILER But in this Prometheus, the explanation is that the Space Jockey is actually a DNA-match to humans, he’s just a bit larger, more defined, and less hairy. That little tusk and exoskeleton is just his space suit. And it’s all about us. They started life on Earth, left us some clues to find them, and once we did, left a lone pilot to go back to Earth to wipe us out. Set aside the fact that this makes no sense. Who creates life just to wipe it out? Other than the god of the Old Testament, who is equally absurd. But that’s not even my main issue. I’m annoyed that Lindelof has tied together all these cave painting alien clichés to make it all about us. That’s not what Alien was about.
Of course I’m still getting it on Blu-ray when it comes out. And I’ll see the sequel, since I’m curious to see where the interesting last choice takes that character. But still, I can’t help but feel that we’ve lost something. An opportunity to tell a story about a race of tusked traders moving strange biomechanical eggs around, perhaps harvesting them from a planet that features a truly dazzling ecosystem that features the alien at its pinnacle. Maybe someone else will tell that story.
SF: Seriously, screw that medical scene. I was trying to man up and be strong for Jamil, but I failed pretty miserably. Sigh.
It’s interesting that you read it as anthropocentric. I took precisely the opposite away from it – it reduced humanity to a failed petri dish science experiment conducted by a species so advanced we can’t even understand their motives. There’s something bleakly satisfying about the basic quest for meaning on the part of the central, notably religious character being smashed up against a cold wall of uncomprehending reality. She maintains her anthropocentric religious viewpoints to the end, but the audience can see that whatever answer she gets won’t satisfy her – humanity were as insignificant to this race as ants.
I think Prometheus is going to age startlingly well as a movie, simply because people will get over the “it wasn’t the Alien prequel I wanted!” stuff and start to consider it on its own merits – and they’ll also discover that plenty of other people have taken away different meanings and interpretations from it, which makes it a hugely discussable movie. I watched it with my flatmate, and we came away with radically different but equally valid ideas of what had just happened. That’s a sign of a good movie to me.
That’s a really good point. I’ve been getting a wide range of theories from friends and co-workers as to what we all just saw, and it’s certainly got staying power beyond something like The Avengers. I do want to see it again on Blu-ray when it comes out, and I do want to see the sequel. So I admit I’m grading extra hard on Mr. Scott here.
I literally just saw it, so this is my raw unfiltered opinion (Background: Huge Blade Runner, Alien, 2001 fan – Asimov, Phillip K Dick fan):
Med bay scene = One of the best space horror scenes ever; Everything else = crap.
Here’s my bullet list of problems:
- It tracked Alien too closely. Every major scene was redone. Made the movie completely predictable and overly derivative. We didn’t need an homage to EVERY major scene in Alien. Bring something new to the table.
- The dialogue was some of the worst writing I’ve ever sat through. Theron’s scene with her ::gasp:: father was one of the worst scenes in science fiction history, two completely unnecessary characters speaking in gibberish.
- Are shotguns really an appropriate weapon for space? Is this the Halo movie?
- Where Blade Runner and Alien had delicate tension and subtlety, this movie had… well, space shotguns. Every character had to reveal what they were feeling, what their motivations were, what motivated their entire species to look for answers, and what they thought the meaning of life was, once every 15 minutes. Every single character had to have a moment to give their personal religion. Not ten minutes into the movie Weyland just says that David has no soul, a theme Blade Runner teased out for, oh, an entire movie. It’s the same eau de theme that covers all of Lost – questions and tropes in the place of real story.
And speaking of Blade Runner, this is from an interview with the actor who portrays Holloway:
Q: Why is Holloway such a jerk to David?
A: Logan Marshall-Green: It’s something that I wanted to implement and I really, really liked it. Michael and I had a blast with it. It’s something I haven’t seen in science fiction, which is a sense of racism or bigotry towards androids and synthetic life.
…
Um… is that a joke? This is a huge theme in science fiction, and hello, the hallmark treatment was in Blade Runner, directed by the same guy directing your movie you nitwit. Infuriating.
This movie definitely left me with a lot of questions… I’m gonna re-watch Primer and go to sleep.
Great notes Dan, I couldn’t and didn’t say it better myself. Totally agreed on the subtlety and dialogue, brought to a boil by the horrendously cliched “father” sequence.
Also, Charlize, fucking turn darling!
Pingback: Star Wars Episode 7: Solving the Late Sequel Question | SOMOFOS